domingo, 7 de fevereiro de 2010
quinta-feira, 13 de agosto de 2009
Boteco FM - WebRadio Ao Vivo
quarta-feira, 27 de maio de 2009
domingo, 10 de maio de 2009
segunda-feira, 27 de abril de 2009
Mundo - Gripe Suína
Eu absolutamente nao sei o quanto as pessoas podem ser inocentes. Mas eu decidi nao entrar em pânico e nao acreditar em muita coisa que a imprensa fala. Vocês realmente acreditam que esse vírus apareceu naturalmente? Lembrem-se... Primeiro, a crise da vaca-louca... Depois, a gripe asiática... Depois, a gripe aviária... E agora, isso? Até quando vamos ser enganados? Quantos e quantos vírus criados em laboratórios existem por aí... Presos... Esse nao tenho idéia de onde veio, mas será que foi liberado de propósito ou acidentalmente? Quantas e quantas perguntas... Todos nós DEVEMOS fazê-las às pessoas que se escondem por trás dessa grande mentira. De tempos em tempos a humanidade é afetada por alguma pandemia. A gripe espanhola de 1911 matou 50 milhoes de pessoas em todo o mundo. Será que esse vírus de agora nao é uma melhoria desse, tendo apenas sido melhorado em laboratório? Ninguém sabe. E pior: os dententores da verdade se escondem por trás de mentiras. Nao entrem em pânico. O Brasil está seguro. Só nao posso dizer o mesmo sobre mim... Antes tornados, agora isso... Eita vida!
Abaixo segue um mapa que mostra onde há casos suspeitos, confirmados e mortes causada pela gripe suína. Vamos ficar de olho...
View H1N1 Swine Flu in a larger map
Abaixo segue um mapa que mostra onde há casos suspeitos, confirmados e mortes causada pela gripe suína. Vamos ficar de olho...
View H1N1 Swine Flu in a larger map
domingo, 5 de abril de 2009
Economic Crisis in the United States
I. How the Economic Crisis Get Started
The Economic Crisis get started in July 2007, when a loss confidence by investors in the value of securitized mortgages in the United States resulted in a liquidity crisis that prompted a substantial injection of money into financial markets by the United States Federal Reserve, Bank of England and the European Central Bank. The indicator of perceived credit risk in the economy (TED spread) spiked up in July 2007, remained volatile for a year, then spiked even higher in September 2008, reaching a record 4.65% on October 10, 2008. In September 2008, many stock markets worldwide crashed and began a time of high volatility, and a considerable number of banks, mortgage lenders and insurance companies failed in the following weeks.
The financial system was vulnerable because of intricate financial contracts and operations, a United States monetary policy making the cost of credit negligible.
Reserve balances from banks in the Federal Reserve System began increasing over required levels of about $10 billion at the beginning of September 2008, just before the presidential debates. Beginning October 6, Section 128 of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 allowed the Federal Reserve System to pay interest on the excess balances, producing further pressure on international credit markets. Excess on reserve balances topped $870 billion in the end of the second week of January 2009. In comparison, the increase in reserve balances reached only $65 billion after September 11, 2001 before falling back to a normal level within a month.
A. Subprime mortgage crisis
The subprime mortgage crisis is a currently financial crisis caused by a dramatic rise in mortgage delinquencies in the United States, with major adverse consequences for banks and financial markets around the globe. The crisis, which has its roots in the closing years of the 20th century, became apparent in 2007 and has exposed weaknesses in financial industry regulation and the in the world’s financial system.
Approximately 80% of American mortgages issued in recent years to subprime borrowers were adjustable-rate mortgages. When American house prices began to decline in 2006/2007 and adjustable-rate mortgages began to change at higher rates, mortgage delinquencies grew up, and securities backed with subprime mortgages, widely held by financial firms, lost most of their value. The result has been a large decline in the capital of many banks and USA government sponsored enterprises, tightening credit around the world.
The mortgage crisis became in a critical stage in the first week of September 2008, characterized by severely contracted liquidity in the global credit markets and insolvency threats to banks and other institutions.
II. Consequences of Economic Crisis in the United States
Some business journals reported about the economic crisis many months before September 2008, with commentary about the financial stability of leading United States investments banks, insurance firms and mortgage banks consequent to the mortgage crisis.
A. Economic Consequences
Starting with failures caused by making bad application of risk controls, large financial institutions in the United States faced a credit crisis and slowdown in economy activity.
The credit crisis was exacerbated by Section 128 of the US Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 which allowed the Federal Reserve to pay interest on excess reserve requirement balances held on deposit from banks, removing the incentive for banks to extend credit services instead of deposit money.
Moreover, the crashing of financial institutions accelerated the liquidity crisis and caused a decrease in international trade. World political leaders, national ministers of finance from many and central bank directors from many countries coordinated their efforts to reduce fears, but the crisis still continued. In the end of October, a currency crisis developed, with investors transferring vast capital resources into stronger currencies such as the yen, the dollar and the Swiss franc, leading many emergent economies to seek aid from the International Monetary Fund.
The Federal government's efforts to support the global financial system have resulted in significant new financial commitments, totaling $7 trillion by November, 2008. These commitments can be characterized as investments, loans, and loan guarantees, rather than direct expenditures. In many cases, the government purchased financial assets such as commercial paper, mortgage-backed securities, or other types of asset-backed paper, to enhance liquidity in frozen markets. As the crisis has progressed, the Fed has expanded the collateral against which it is willing to lend to include higher-risk assets.
The extent to which the Federal government is at risk because of these investments and guarantees remains to be seen. The upshot has been a US$1 trillion increase in the national debt of the USA during FY 2008, compared to an average increase of US$550 billion during the previous five years. The total debt reached $10 trillion in September 2008.
In addition, state and local government property tax collections are expected to decline because of an estimated $1.2 trillion reduction in housing prices, and a slowing of the overall American economy. This expectation is affecting the ability of state governments to finance their operations through bond sales. Finding themselves unable to borrow, the states of California and Massachusetts have requested that the Fed lend them the amounts they would have borrowed elsewhere under normal conditions.
B. Social Consequences
There are many social problems caused by the Economic Crisis. People losing their houses, jobs and the banks having more requirements for loans are the worst consequences brought by the crisis.
Many Americans are losing their houses, because they did not pay the mortgage. It is easy to find in the newspaper about homeless people through the country. In some places, we can see people living under the basic conditions of life, absolutely without hygiene or comfort.
In the last months, the unemployment grew up and many people lost the essential condition to have a normal life. Without job, people have no money to do anything. It is not hard to walk through a big city like New York and see large queues of people looking for a job.
If somebody needs a loan, this is not the best moment to get one. Many banks don’t have money for personal loans. In addition, have stocks also is a very dangerous business. You need more luck than knowledge to make good negotiations.
III. Recovery Plans for the Economy
A. The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 is a stimulus package approved by Congress and signed into law by President Barack Obama on February 17, 2009. The Act of Congress was based on proposals made by President Obama to provide a stimulus to the United States economy. The Act includes federal tax cuts, expansion of unemployment benefits and other social welfare provisions, and domestic spending in education, health care, and infrastructure, including the energy sector. The Act also includes numerous non-economic recovery related items that were either part of longer-term plans or desired by Congress. The government action is much larger than the Economic Stimulus Act of 2008, which consisted primarily of tax rebate checks.
The bill was first approved by the House of Representatives, and then by the Senate. Congressional negotiators announced on February 11 that they had completed the Conference Report of the bill. The Conference Report with final handwritten provisions was made available to the public on February 13. On that day, the Conference Report was voted on and passed as Roll Call Vote 70 by the House, 246-183. The vote was largely along party lines with all 246 Yea votes given by Democrats and the Nay vote split between 176 Republicans and 7 Democrats. No Republicans in the House voted for the bill. Later that day, the Senate passed the bill, 60-38, with all Democrats and Independents voting for the bill along with three Republicans. The remaining 38 Republican senators voted against the bill. The bill was signed into law on February 17 by President Obama at an economic forum he was hosting in Denver, Colorado.
B. What Most Economists Wonder About the Stimulus Plan
A group of economists has told Democrats in Congress that it might take longer for the recently-passed $787 billion stimulus plan to generate the number of jobs lawmakers and President Barack Obama hoped it would.
Majority Democrats and President Obama identified job creation as a main objective of the economic stimulus package Congress approved last month.
However, in a meeting at the United States Capitol with House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi and other Democratic leaders, four prominent economists dampened that expectation.
Allen Sinai, Chief Global Economist at Boston-based Decision Economics, Inc., says “the number of jobs created by the stimulus plan might be "a bit disappointing."
Sinai said he doesn't necessarily think another stimulus will be necessary, adding that the economy is in the process of healing itself and could improve significantly in 6 to 12 months. Therefore, Mark Zandi of Moody's Economy.com in New York says that as difficult as 2009 has been so far, the rest of the year could be worse. He adds that Americans should prepare. More stimulus legislation will be needed. "We are going to need more taxpayer money up front. I think that another stimulus package is a reasonable probability, given the way things are going," he said.
House Speaker Pelosi agreed, saying Congress and the Obama administration must keep the door open to additional steps, even as the current stimulus plan begins to work.
Pelosi responded again to criticisms from minority Republicans that the Obama administration and Congressional Democrats are creating permanent increases in government programs and spending. "It's very important that the message not be that we have raised the base line for spending. We have not. We have a stimulus which is targeted in a time frame to make the difference," he said.
Republican leaders continued those criticisms on Tuesday. Representative Eric Cantor of Virginia assailed Democratic priorities in dealing with the recession, and President Obama's budget proposals. "People are afraid because they see proposals being offered every day here to raise their taxes," he said.
New York Representative, Democrat Charles Rangel said he hopes Republicans will stop opposing actions the administration has taken. "This is not a partisan issue. It is a national issue that demands at least the involvement of Republicans and when you see a divided Congress, there are people that wonder and worry," he said.
Economist Rebecca Blank with the Brookings Institution here in Washington was optimistic that positive results will come from efforts to prevent more job losses and mortgage defaults. But she pointed to a bleak economic picture, saying recovery - when it does begin - will be slow. "Currently, 12 1/2 million people are unemployed, and that is a lot of pain. And the bad news is it is going to get worse and we're not coming out of this fast. And particularly labor market numbers, [the] unemployment, and unemployment lags [behind] recovery - so even when an aggregate recovery starts, those numbers are not going to turn around immediately. They will be four to six months behind," she said.
House Financial Services Committee Chairman, Democrat Barney Frank expressed hope that steps taken so far will have a stimulative effect on the stock market. "I believe that what we are doing is very pro-market. We are dealing with some problems that the market faces today, and we are talking about putting in place in the future things that will help the market work better," he said.
Saying the difference between a sharp recession and a depression is a loss of faith, economist Mark Zandi said a restoration of confidence will be key to recovery. "That will be restored over the next few weeks [or] months as the policy efforts that have been put in place begin to take effect and people really see that it makes a difference. Right now, they just don't believe. And if they get some palpable signs of some improvement, I think things can turn [around] very quickly," he said.
White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs had no immediate reaction to the assessments Democrats received from the economists.
On the need for a second economic stimulus measure, Gibbs would only point to recent statistics, including unemployment numbers, saying they provide "a sobering reminder" of the many economic challenges Americans face.
The Economic Crisis get started in July 2007, when a loss confidence by investors in the value of securitized mortgages in the United States resulted in a liquidity crisis that prompted a substantial injection of money into financial markets by the United States Federal Reserve, Bank of England and the European Central Bank. The indicator of perceived credit risk in the economy (TED spread) spiked up in July 2007, remained volatile for a year, then spiked even higher in September 2008, reaching a record 4.65% on October 10, 2008. In September 2008, many stock markets worldwide crashed and began a time of high volatility, and a considerable number of banks, mortgage lenders and insurance companies failed in the following weeks.
The financial system was vulnerable because of intricate financial contracts and operations, a United States monetary policy making the cost of credit negligible.
Reserve balances from banks in the Federal Reserve System began increasing over required levels of about $10 billion at the beginning of September 2008, just before the presidential debates. Beginning October 6, Section 128 of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 allowed the Federal Reserve System to pay interest on the excess balances, producing further pressure on international credit markets. Excess on reserve balances topped $870 billion in the end of the second week of January 2009. In comparison, the increase in reserve balances reached only $65 billion after September 11, 2001 before falling back to a normal level within a month.
A. Subprime mortgage crisis
The subprime mortgage crisis is a currently financial crisis caused by a dramatic rise in mortgage delinquencies in the United States, with major adverse consequences for banks and financial markets around the globe. The crisis, which has its roots in the closing years of the 20th century, became apparent in 2007 and has exposed weaknesses in financial industry regulation and the in the world’s financial system.
Approximately 80% of American mortgages issued in recent years to subprime borrowers were adjustable-rate mortgages. When American house prices began to decline in 2006/2007 and adjustable-rate mortgages began to change at higher rates, mortgage delinquencies grew up, and securities backed with subprime mortgages, widely held by financial firms, lost most of their value. The result has been a large decline in the capital of many banks and USA government sponsored enterprises, tightening credit around the world.
The mortgage crisis became in a critical stage in the first week of September 2008, characterized by severely contracted liquidity in the global credit markets and insolvency threats to banks and other institutions.
II. Consequences of Economic Crisis in the United States
Some business journals reported about the economic crisis many months before September 2008, with commentary about the financial stability of leading United States investments banks, insurance firms and mortgage banks consequent to the mortgage crisis.
A. Economic Consequences
Starting with failures caused by making bad application of risk controls, large financial institutions in the United States faced a credit crisis and slowdown in economy activity.
The credit crisis was exacerbated by Section 128 of the US Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 which allowed the Federal Reserve to pay interest on excess reserve requirement balances held on deposit from banks, removing the incentive for banks to extend credit services instead of deposit money.
Moreover, the crashing of financial institutions accelerated the liquidity crisis and caused a decrease in international trade. World political leaders, national ministers of finance from many and central bank directors from many countries coordinated their efforts to reduce fears, but the crisis still continued. In the end of October, a currency crisis developed, with investors transferring vast capital resources into stronger currencies such as the yen, the dollar and the Swiss franc, leading many emergent economies to seek aid from the International Monetary Fund.
The Federal government's efforts to support the global financial system have resulted in significant new financial commitments, totaling $7 trillion by November, 2008. These commitments can be characterized as investments, loans, and loan guarantees, rather than direct expenditures. In many cases, the government purchased financial assets such as commercial paper, mortgage-backed securities, or other types of asset-backed paper, to enhance liquidity in frozen markets. As the crisis has progressed, the Fed has expanded the collateral against which it is willing to lend to include higher-risk assets.
The extent to which the Federal government is at risk because of these investments and guarantees remains to be seen. The upshot has been a US$1 trillion increase in the national debt of the USA during FY 2008, compared to an average increase of US$550 billion during the previous five years. The total debt reached $10 trillion in September 2008.
In addition, state and local government property tax collections are expected to decline because of an estimated $1.2 trillion reduction in housing prices, and a slowing of the overall American economy. This expectation is affecting the ability of state governments to finance their operations through bond sales. Finding themselves unable to borrow, the states of California and Massachusetts have requested that the Fed lend them the amounts they would have borrowed elsewhere under normal conditions.
B. Social Consequences
There are many social problems caused by the Economic Crisis. People losing their houses, jobs and the banks having more requirements for loans are the worst consequences brought by the crisis.
Many Americans are losing their houses, because they did not pay the mortgage. It is easy to find in the newspaper about homeless people through the country. In some places, we can see people living under the basic conditions of life, absolutely without hygiene or comfort.
In the last months, the unemployment grew up and many people lost the essential condition to have a normal life. Without job, people have no money to do anything. It is not hard to walk through a big city like New York and see large queues of people looking for a job.
If somebody needs a loan, this is not the best moment to get one. Many banks don’t have money for personal loans. In addition, have stocks also is a very dangerous business. You need more luck than knowledge to make good negotiations.
III. Recovery Plans for the Economy
A. The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 is a stimulus package approved by Congress and signed into law by President Barack Obama on February 17, 2009. The Act of Congress was based on proposals made by President Obama to provide a stimulus to the United States economy. The Act includes federal tax cuts, expansion of unemployment benefits and other social welfare provisions, and domestic spending in education, health care, and infrastructure, including the energy sector. The Act also includes numerous non-economic recovery related items that were either part of longer-term plans or desired by Congress. The government action is much larger than the Economic Stimulus Act of 2008, which consisted primarily of tax rebate checks.
The bill was first approved by the House of Representatives, and then by the Senate. Congressional negotiators announced on February 11 that they had completed the Conference Report of the bill. The Conference Report with final handwritten provisions was made available to the public on February 13. On that day, the Conference Report was voted on and passed as Roll Call Vote 70 by the House, 246-183. The vote was largely along party lines with all 246 Yea votes given by Democrats and the Nay vote split between 176 Republicans and 7 Democrats. No Republicans in the House voted for the bill. Later that day, the Senate passed the bill, 60-38, with all Democrats and Independents voting for the bill along with three Republicans. The remaining 38 Republican senators voted against the bill. The bill was signed into law on February 17 by President Obama at an economic forum he was hosting in Denver, Colorado.
B. What Most Economists Wonder About the Stimulus Plan
A group of economists has told Democrats in Congress that it might take longer for the recently-passed $787 billion stimulus plan to generate the number of jobs lawmakers and President Barack Obama hoped it would.
Majority Democrats and President Obama identified job creation as a main objective of the economic stimulus package Congress approved last month.
However, in a meeting at the United States Capitol with House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi and other Democratic leaders, four prominent economists dampened that expectation.
Allen Sinai, Chief Global Economist at Boston-based Decision Economics, Inc., says “the number of jobs created by the stimulus plan might be "a bit disappointing."
Sinai said he doesn't necessarily think another stimulus will be necessary, adding that the economy is in the process of healing itself and could improve significantly in 6 to 12 months. Therefore, Mark Zandi of Moody's Economy.com in New York says that as difficult as 2009 has been so far, the rest of the year could be worse. He adds that Americans should prepare. More stimulus legislation will be needed. "We are going to need more taxpayer money up front. I think that another stimulus package is a reasonable probability, given the way things are going," he said.
House Speaker Pelosi agreed, saying Congress and the Obama administration must keep the door open to additional steps, even as the current stimulus plan begins to work.
Pelosi responded again to criticisms from minority Republicans that the Obama administration and Congressional Democrats are creating permanent increases in government programs and spending. "It's very important that the message not be that we have raised the base line for spending. We have not. We have a stimulus which is targeted in a time frame to make the difference," he said.
Republican leaders continued those criticisms on Tuesday. Representative Eric Cantor of Virginia assailed Democratic priorities in dealing with the recession, and President Obama's budget proposals. "People are afraid because they see proposals being offered every day here to raise their taxes," he said.
New York Representative, Democrat Charles Rangel said he hopes Republicans will stop opposing actions the administration has taken. "This is not a partisan issue. It is a national issue that demands at least the involvement of Republicans and when you see a divided Congress, there are people that wonder and worry," he said.
Economist Rebecca Blank with the Brookings Institution here in Washington was optimistic that positive results will come from efforts to prevent more job losses and mortgage defaults. But she pointed to a bleak economic picture, saying recovery - when it does begin - will be slow. "Currently, 12 1/2 million people are unemployed, and that is a lot of pain. And the bad news is it is going to get worse and we're not coming out of this fast. And particularly labor market numbers, [the] unemployment, and unemployment lags [behind] recovery - so even when an aggregate recovery starts, those numbers are not going to turn around immediately. They will be four to six months behind," she said.
House Financial Services Committee Chairman, Democrat Barney Frank expressed hope that steps taken so far will have a stimulative effect on the stock market. "I believe that what we are doing is very pro-market. We are dealing with some problems that the market faces today, and we are talking about putting in place in the future things that will help the market work better," he said.
Saying the difference between a sharp recession and a depression is a loss of faith, economist Mark Zandi said a restoration of confidence will be key to recovery. "That will be restored over the next few weeks [or] months as the policy efforts that have been put in place begin to take effect and people really see that it makes a difference. Right now, they just don't believe. And if they get some palpable signs of some improvement, I think things can turn [around] very quickly," he said.
White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs had no immediate reaction to the assessments Democrats received from the economists.
On the need for a second economic stimulus measure, Gibbs would only point to recent statistics, including unemployment numbers, saying they provide "a sobering reminder" of the many economic challenges Americans face.
quarta-feira, 4 de março de 2009
Televisão - Vênus Platinada Vs. Pequena Notável
Parece que a toda poderosa "Globo" está temendo perder sua hegemonia na televisão brasileira. Como se não bastasse a rivalidade contra a Record, a "vênus platinada" começou a sentir as "pancadas" da pequena notável cearense: a TV Diário.
Desde a quarta-feira de cinzas, milhares de brasileiros ficaram indignados com o desaparecimento do canal cearense que simplesmente desapareceu, sem o mínimo de consideração com os telespectadores.
Dizem as más línguas e as bocas pequenas que, a culpada por isso tudo é, nada mais nada menos que a Rede Globo de Televisão.
A TV Diário é uma emissora que pertence ao Grupo Verdes Mares de Comunicação, que possui várias empresas, dentre elas, a TV Verdes Mares, afiliada da Rede Globo no estado do Ceará.
Aí mora o problema. A TV Globo diz que "nenhum canal pode ultrapassar seu limite territorial". Esse é o motivo para a "vênus platinada" intervir na transmissão do sinal da TV Diário pela parabólica.
Isso é pura mentira, algo que passa dos limites do direito do cidadão. Um canal que mostra a cultura nordestina para todo o Brasil não pode ficar fora do ar dessa forma.
O povo nordestino ainda é discriminado, principalmente nas regiões Sul, Sudeste e Centro-oeste. Onde quer que o nordestino vá ele é tratado como alguém que "foi embora do nordeste por causa da seca".
As pessoas que tem esse pensamento são absolutamente desprovidas de cultura. A Região Nordeste é a mais rica em cultura. Não estou dizendo que as outras regiões são desprovidas de cultura. Apenas não possuem a mesma vivacidade que a cultura nordestina possui. Cultura tal que estava encantando o Brasil inteiro, fato que estava dando muita audiêcia para a TV Diário.
O que mais incomoda é o fato de que nenhum tipo mídia escrita ou falada ainda comentou sobre o assunto, a não ser claro, vários e vários blogs e sites pela internet, por ser um tipo de meio de comunicação "livre". Além disso, o Grupo Verdes Mares ainda não prestou nenhum tipo de esclarecimento sobre o fato ocorrido.
O que é isso? Como tal fato pode acontecer e ninguém de nenhum dos lados falar nada a respeito, nem pra dar um esclarecimento? Onde vamos parar desse jeito? E os direitos das pessoas, onde ficam? Fomos consultados em relação a este fato? Será que vivemos realmente numa democracia? Ou vivemos numa "democracia"? Será que a Globo realmente manda no Brasil?
Enquanto muitos brasileiros se indignam por causa deste fato, a Globo vai empurrando suas novelas que mostram realidades completamente diferentes daquelas vividas pelos brasileiros, além do "Big Brother", Faustão, jornais editados e tantas outras coisas que em nada contribuem ou representam para a cultura brasileira.
Desde a quarta-feira de cinzas, milhares de brasileiros ficaram indignados com o desaparecimento do canal cearense que simplesmente desapareceu, sem o mínimo de consideração com os telespectadores.
Dizem as más línguas e as bocas pequenas que, a culpada por isso tudo é, nada mais nada menos que a Rede Globo de Televisão.
A TV Diário é uma emissora que pertence ao Grupo Verdes Mares de Comunicação, que possui várias empresas, dentre elas, a TV Verdes Mares, afiliada da Rede Globo no estado do Ceará.
Aí mora o problema. A TV Globo diz que "nenhum canal pode ultrapassar seu limite territorial". Esse é o motivo para a "vênus platinada" intervir na transmissão do sinal da TV Diário pela parabólica.
Isso é pura mentira, algo que passa dos limites do direito do cidadão. Um canal que mostra a cultura nordestina para todo o Brasil não pode ficar fora do ar dessa forma.
O povo nordestino ainda é discriminado, principalmente nas regiões Sul, Sudeste e Centro-oeste. Onde quer que o nordestino vá ele é tratado como alguém que "foi embora do nordeste por causa da seca".
As pessoas que tem esse pensamento são absolutamente desprovidas de cultura. A Região Nordeste é a mais rica em cultura. Não estou dizendo que as outras regiões são desprovidas de cultura. Apenas não possuem a mesma vivacidade que a cultura nordestina possui. Cultura tal que estava encantando o Brasil inteiro, fato que estava dando muita audiêcia para a TV Diário.
O que mais incomoda é o fato de que nenhum tipo mídia escrita ou falada ainda comentou sobre o assunto, a não ser claro, vários e vários blogs e sites pela internet, por ser um tipo de meio de comunicação "livre". Além disso, o Grupo Verdes Mares ainda não prestou nenhum tipo de esclarecimento sobre o fato ocorrido.
O que é isso? Como tal fato pode acontecer e ninguém de nenhum dos lados falar nada a respeito, nem pra dar um esclarecimento? Onde vamos parar desse jeito? E os direitos das pessoas, onde ficam? Fomos consultados em relação a este fato? Será que vivemos realmente numa democracia? Ou vivemos numa "democracia"? Será que a Globo realmente manda no Brasil?
Enquanto muitos brasileiros se indignam por causa deste fato, a Globo vai empurrando suas novelas que mostram realidades completamente diferentes daquelas vividas pelos brasileiros, além do "Big Brother", Faustão, jornais editados e tantas outras coisas que em nada contribuem ou representam para a cultura brasileira.
Assinar:
Postagens (Atom)